August 1, 2013
North Carolina is set to be the sixth state to pass a law requiring American law in its court system. The bill has passed both house of the legislature and is awaiting the signature of the governor. It should not take a long time for the governor to make a decision on this bill but it has already been on his desk for a week.
It would be helpful for you to let the governor know you would like him to sign the bill.
Please call or write the Governor Pat McCrory today.
Telephone: (919) 814-2000
Fax: (919) 733-2120
Email: Click Here
CAIR is doing all that it can to oppose laws that keep Sharia law out of our court system. They have produced a 38-page legislative lobbying kit to help Muslims lobby against “American Laws for American Courts” legislation. Twenty-two states are considering such laws at this time.
The title of CAIR’s handbook, “Securing Religious Liberty,” They are trying to convince us that their First Amendment right to freedom of religion is being threatened. The truth is quite the contrary. People of all faiths are allowed to build houses of worship, evangelize openly, and perform their religious rites in private and public without government or public interference. This is not true where Sharia is the law of the land.
If you would like to read the document for yourself you can get ithere.
In their handbook CAIR tells Muslims to distort the truth about Sharia law. In their talking points, which start on page 20 of the handbook, here is what they falsely claim is the nature of Sharia law:
What is Sharia?
I would like to point out two things that must be considered in determining the accuracy of these statements. The first is, if this is all that Sharia is about, why do they need it to be used in our courts? How and when we pray, how much we give to charity, and how we choose to be buried is not part of our legal system. Our courts give them all the rights they need in these areas based upon the first amendment, and amendment that they would eliminate if they had the power to do so.
The second thing is that Saudi Arabia and the Taliban are ruled by Sharia. It is, therefore, proper to look and them and other countries where Sharia is the law, to judge the nature of Sharia law.
The talking points in this handbook are nothing but a smoke screen. The major purpose of these talking points is to obscure the true nature of Sharia Law. They even say that many Muslims who have come to America attest to the fact that they can practice Islam more freely under our system of government than the could under the governments from which they came (page 21). One of the reasons this is true is because Sharia allows for no difference of opinion or interpretation.
ALAC (American Law for American Courts) is not concerned about Muslims praying, worshiping, building Mosque, Madrassas, Marriage, Pilgramages, Alms, Fasting, Feast. Although this has nothing to do with ALAC laws, Muslims want to make it LOOK like it infringes on their rights in these areas.
I would like to say that in one of these areas, the madrassas, there should be laws against them. The madrassas is a brainwashing school to teach hatred for all that is not Islamic. They are breading grounds for terrorists.
It is not the religious aspects of Sharia Law which CAIR and other Islamic organizations need to defend, because they are, for the most part, good and humanitarian in their intent. Sharia Law goes way beyond religious practices. It allows young women to be married without their consent, it allows men to marry up to four wives, it allows men to beat their unruly wives, and it denies women numerous legal rights guaranteed them by the U.S. Constitution and state laws. Most of Sharia Law, as a matter of fact, has nothing to do with religious worship or practices.
Sharia Law is necessary to Islam because it ensures submission of family members and of the community by the threat of violence. It uses the same tactics to intimidate and prevent any criticism of Islam by non-Muslims. This is why It allows “honor killings” (the killing of family members who are thought to dishonor the family or Islam), the killing of those who turn from Islam (apostates), and the killing of non-Muslims who will not submit to Islam (unbelievers in Islam).
IS SHARIA A SET OF LAWS OR “A DYNAMIC SET OF INTERPRETATIONS”?
Obscuring the true nature of Sharia is necessary for CAIR’s defense of Sharia Law. The handbook says “don’t use the expression “Sharia Law.” They insist that it merely “informs how Muslims pray, eat, and defines their obligations to the greater society.” By calling it “a dynamic set of interpretations”, it makes it seem like Sharia a harmless set of rules that only effects Muslims. Muslims are instructed to avoid all discussion of the specific provisions of Sharia Law.
This vagueness makes it difficult for U.S. Legislators to defend our system or to oppose theirs.
Furthermore, the implication of “interpretations” makes us believe that different jurists at different times could make different judgments because there is no system of judicial case law connected with Sharia Law. This makes it seem that those “interpretations“ are arbitrary.
Shariah is not arbitrary – It has purpose, design, and strict lettered guidelines. There are five different schools of Islamic law which emerged in the 8th and 9th Centuries – Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanbali, Ja’fari. With the exception of the Ja’fari, school which is Shi’a, the other schools are identical in 75% of their legal conclusions.
The rulings were codified and documented by Ahmad al-Misri in the 14th Century into a Shafi’i manual for use by Muslims who were far from the Islamic centers. That manual is called ‘Umdat al-Salik, or in English, Reliance of the Traveller. Not only does the English version of the manual have the approval of the world’s center of Islamic jurisprudence – al-Azhar University in Cairo – but it is also endorsed by the International Institute of Islamic Thought (Herndon, Virginia) and the Fiqh Council of North America, which calls the Reliance of the Traveler “the consciousness of the non-Arabic-speaking Muslim with a sound understanding of Sacred Law.“
All though it may not be the authoritative book on Shariah, it certainly Establishes a benchmark for the validity of “dynamic interpretations” contained in fatwas (rulings by Islamic religious scholars) and other legal pronouncements by imams and mullahs.
Here are just a few of the legal precedents supported gy “Reliance of the Traveler”:
Copyright 2017 Pierre Coovert, All rights reserved